Through the eyes of our past we see our future.

-

If you want to see anything specific just shoot me a message, I don't mind fulfilling requests.

Since some people have asked for it my skype name is "collective.history", feel free to add me.



{} When Michael Dukakis was asked, in a 1988 debate, whether he’d still oppose the death penalty for someone who had raped and murdered his wife, his response was philosophically consistent with his political beliefs. But the delivery proved almost emotionless. (Associated Press)

When Michael Dukakis was asked, in a 1988 debate, whether he’d still oppose the death penalty for someone who had raped and murdered his wife, his response was philosophically consistent with his political beliefs. But the delivery proved almost emotionless. (Associated Press)

31 notes · history, michael dukakis, 1988, 1980s, presidential debate, debate, death penalty, interesting,
  1. acts-of-god reblogged this from collectivehistory
  2. graceadlerdesigns reblogged this from collectivehistory
  3. flitallaflutter reblogged this from collectivehistory
  4. ninny-horse reblogged this from collectivehistory
  5. officialnotes reblogged this from collectivehistory and added:
    political debates=slow-mo coliseum
  6. sigurrissol reblogged this from collectivehistory
  7. christine2332 reblogged this from collectivehistory
  8. marsthebringerofwar reblogged this from collectivehistory
  9. thenervousbury reblogged this from collectivehistory and added:
    “Governor, if Kitty Dukakis [his wife] were raped and murdered, would you favor an irrevocable death penalty for the...
  10. whyinthehell reblogged this from collectivehistory and added:
    To be fair, wasn’t his delivery on everything “almost emotionless”? (I voted for him.)
  11. rhealikesmangos reblogged this from collectivehistory
  12. desjeunes reblogged this from collectivehistory
  13. pisatofevrale reblogged this from collectivehistory
  14. collectivehistory posted this